Recommendations for Judiciary Improvements (2026)

Recommendations for Judiciary Improvements (2026)

AmCham's Judiciary Committee has prepared the third edition of its position paper proposing recommendations for improving the judiciary.

AmCham emphasizes that an efficient, predictable, and transparent judiciary is a key prerequisite for strengthening legal certainty, economic competitiveness, and investment attractiveness. The document addresses current challenges in the functioning of the judiciary and the legislative process and presents targeted, actionable recommendations aimed at long-term system improvement.

  • Accessibility of the judiciary

The position paper highlights the need for greater openness and accessibility of the judiciary toward citizens and the business community. It recommends introducing systematic and anonymous user satisfaction surveys, ensuring the availability of information on expected timelines for judicial decisions, and establishing clear contact points for procedural inquiries. These measures would enhance transparency, increase trust in the judiciary, and strengthen overall legal certainty.

  • Specialization and training within the judiciary

The document underscores the importance of strengthening judicial specialization and modernizing the system of judicial education, particularly in complex and economically relevant areas. It proposes reorganizing judicial training, increasing the involvement of private-sector experts, encouraging the recruitment of judges with practical business experience, and providing continuous training on new technologies. The objective is to improve the quality of judicial decisions and the efficiency of court proceedings.

  • Improving the legislative process

In the section addressing the legislative framework, the position paper draws attention to limited predictability and insufficient stakeholder involvement in the early stages of law-making. It recommends introducing early and structured stakeholder consultations, establishing a transparent and real-time legislative activity timeline, limiting the use of expedited procedures, and introducing mechanisms for official interpretations and ex-post evaluation of legislation. These measures aim to deliver higher-quality, more stable, and more implementable legislation.